TL;DR
Get beauty and skincare favorites delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Glamour UK has published a retrospective of Catherine Zeta-Jones’s beauty looks, tracing her hair and makeup choices from the 1990s through the decades covered in its report. The article highlights recurring elements including defined eyes, smoky shadow, polished updos and statement lips; it is an editorial selection, not a new announcement from Zeta-Jones.
Glamour UK has published a retrospective of Catherine Zeta-Jones’s beauty looks, revisiting hair and makeup choices associated with the actor across several decades. The editorial selection tracks styles from her 1990s appearances through the 2000s and later, highlighting her recurring defined eyes, smoky makeup and polished glamour.
The report frames Zeta-Jones’s beauty history through photographs and appearances linked to her screen career, award events and campaigns. Its examples include a 1992 music-video look with side-flipped curls and red lipstick, as well as a contrasting half-up style with grungy eyeshadow and chunky French-tip nails. The article also points to the loose, softly styled hair and sleek updos she wore during the middle of the decade.
Several high-profile premieres provide the retrospective’s 1990s reference points. At the 1997 Men in Black premiere, Zeta-Jones wore face-framing layers and defined eye makeup, while the report describes her look for the 1998 Mask of Zorro premiere as a low flamenco bun paired with a sheer smoky eye. At the Air Force One premiere in 1997, she wore a berry lip with polished, lightly styled hair.
For the 2000s, Glamour UK highlights her 2003 Academy Awards appearance, where she won Best Supporting Actress for Chicago in a low, centre-parted chignon, defined eyes and a brick-red lip. Other selected moments include shimmery green eyeshadow at the Intolerable Cruelty premiere, a loose curl and light smoky eye at The Terminal premiere, and a sleek beehive at the magazine’s 2006 Women of the Year awards. These examples illustrate the article’s emphasis on recurring motifs rather than a single signature look.
A Glamour Archive Across Decades
The retrospective offers readers a compact visual record of how red-carpet beauty trends changed while Zeta-Jones continued to return to familiar elements. The looks cited by Glamour UK move from 1990s grunge-inspired shadow and face-framing layers to 2000s side fringes, colourful eye makeup and elaborate updos. Across those shifts, the editorial identifies strong eye definition and classic glamour as consistent features.
For readers seeking beauty inspiration, the piece works as a set of references rather than a guide to products or techniques. It places each look alongside a date and event, making it possible to see how styling choices related to a premiere, awards ceremony or campaign. The framing as favourite looks is Glamour UK’s editorial judgment; it does not establish that the actor has endorsed particular products or recommended the styles.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Darling Buds to Chicago
Zeta-Jones first became widely known in the UK through the television series The Darling Buds of May, according to the source article. Her international profile grew with films including The Mask of Zorro, and she later won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for her performance as Velma Kelly in Chicago. Glamour UK uses those career markers to organize its retrospective rather than presenting a new interview or statement from the actor.
The supplied report also refers to later roles, including Morticia Addams in Wednesday and Jackie Price in Kill Jackie. It describes changes in beauty fashion by decade, including skinny brows and grungy colour in the 1990s, side fringes and heavy liner in the 2000s, and cut-crease eyeshadow in the 2010s. The source excerpt ends partway through its 2010s section, so it does not provide a complete account of every era or featured look.
““Few people have a beauty archive quite as lethal as Catherine Zeta-Jones.””
— Glamour UK
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Retrospective Leaves Out
The supplied source does not state the article’s publication date, explain how its favourite looks were chosen, or include comments from Zeta-Jones or her representatives. The source excerpt also cuts off during the 2010s discussion, leaving the complete list of looks and any coverage of the 2020s unavailable here. The article’s descriptions are editorial characterizations; details beyond those named in the report cannot be confirmed from the material provided.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Further Looks May Be Added
There is no announced follow-up, interview or new project tied to the retrospective in the supplied material. Readers can consult the Glamour UK article and its accompanying images for the full selection and any sections omitted from the excerpt. Future appearances or screen roles could provide new examples for a later update, but no such update is confirmed.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What is the news about Catherine Zeta-Jones?
Glamour UK published a retrospective of her beauty looks, revisiting styles associated with appearances and roles across her career.
Which decades does the supplied report cover?
The excerpt discusses the 1990s and 2000s in detail and begins a section on the 2010s. It also refers to more recent roles, but the supplied text ends before the full later-era coverage.
What beauty styles does the article highlight?
Examples include smoky eyes, defined liner, red and berry lips, loose curls, face-framing layers, chignons and a beehive. These are selected examples from the publication’s editorial roundup.
Did Catherine Zeta-Jones comment on the retrospective?
No comment from Zeta-Jones is included in the supplied source material. The descriptions and judgments are attributed to Glamour UK.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
